Sheikh Mujib and Sheikh Hasina’s purpose of struggle is the same

Published : 19 Jan 2020 08:09 PM | Updated : 28 Sep 2021 05:54 PM

If we consider the period of 1981-1996 we would find She­ikh Hasina fighting not against the Pak military rule but against the Bangla­desh general who captured power only three and half years after the country was made free, killing the Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and ousting Awami League, the party that brought our independence. Sheikh Hasina got elected president of Awami League in 1981 when she was in political asylum in india. 

She entered the country with the same kind of responsibility i.e, to oust the military dictators General Zia and General Ershad who governed the country for nearly 15 years almost with the same strategies. Sheikh Mujib fought for long 23 years for realizing the voting rights of the people of East Pakistan. Sheikh Hasina had to fight for people’s right to franchise against military rule of Ershad and Zia.

Bangladesh was not supposed to be under military rule. Those who opposed the war of liberation took revenge killing the leader of the revolution Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib and putting the country under military rule that was practiced by Pakistan. None in Bangladesh could believe that any member of Bangladesh army could kill the father of the nation and introduce military dictatorship. 

It was the duty of Sheikh Hasina since she entered the politics of Bangladesh to bring an end to the military rule as done by her father against the military dictators of Pakistan. Sheikh Hasina had to fight against the military regimes (Zia and Ershad) for 15 years to establish voting rights of people, democracy and rule of law. It was in 1996 that she got elected as the prime Minister of the country.  In fact she is the leader who realized democracy in Bangladesh following her father who was the first leader who introduced parliamentary democracy in 1973.

The political demands for which Bangabandhu had to fight against the Pak military Junta are democracy, secularism, Bengali nationalism and social justice. Sheikh Hasina had to fight for the same causes. Even now being the Prime Minister of the country she has been working hard to address them. Both the father and the daughter had to fight almost in an identical manner. Bangabandhu made the country free to achieve objectives and Sheikh Hasina has been fighting in the independent Bangladesh to achieve the same objectives that her father had to fight for. 

The counter revolution held in 1975 did change the very state principles of independent Bangladesh. In independent Bangladesh the people under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina has been fighting for restoring those values that had been established through the war of liberation in 1971. The counter revolution in 1975 did really reverse the existing order. So the struggle of the father and the daughter although different in form, but the objective was the same.

If we look into the long 70 year’s history of Awami League as a political party and compare some events that took place during the 23 year’s i.e. the period when East Pakistan was in existence from 1947 with the period from 1981 to 2019 under Sheikh Hasina we would find a lot of similarity.

Sheikh Mujib is the leader who fought for Pakistan along with AK Fazlul Huq, Hussain Shahid Suhrawardy, Abul Hashim, but after its birth felt the uselessness of two nation’s theory and started movement for autonomy against the central government. That was the demand for regional autonomy and democracy. The Pak rulers denied democracy. So there was martial law in 1958 and General Ayub ruled the country for ten years ignoring the people of the East.

 Hussain Shahid Suhrawady as the Prime Minister of Pakistan with only 13 MP tried to frame a democratic constitution in 1957 for Pakistan. But General Ayub declared martial law to cling to power and continued for years. What was put to jeopardy was democracy and rights of the people of East Pakistan.

The leader who fought against them was Sheikh Mujib with his party Awami League. At one stage in 1966, after a war between and india, Bangabandhu declared his six- point programme. A revolutionary zeal grew among the people of East Pakistan against the oppression and suppression by West . Situation became so explosive that General Ayub had to talk in language of weapon and Sheikh Mujib replied by organizing the entire population of Pakistan against them.

 Agartala Conspiracy Case lodged by Pak ruler helped Sheikh Mujib to gather a lot of strength as the only opposition in East Pakistan. The consequence was the mass movement of 1969 bringing Sheikh Mujib out of cantonment and rewarded with title Bangabandhu. The result of the movement was the general election in 1970 based on six-point of Sheikh Mujib. In that election Awami League under the leadership of Sheikh Mujib got 167 seats out of 169 in East Pakistan establishing that Sheikh Mujib was the only spokesperson for the people of the East. No other leader could attain that position.

The Pak military dictator General Yahiya did not call the assembly on 15 February 1971 as suggested by Sheikh Mujib. They called assembly on 3rd March at the advice of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Sensing a Possible danger, Yahiya finally postponed the session of the parliament. Sheikh Mujib just before his arrest declared the independence of Bangladesh. There were of events that took place between 1957 and 1971. Before that Sheikh Mujib played an important role in the language movement in 1952 and in Jukta Front election in 1954.

In fact the ideology for which Bangabandhu had to fight was almost the same for which sheikh Hasina has been fighting today. In independent Bangladesh, in  its constitution, Bangabandhu incorporated secularism, nationalism, democracy and socialism for the emancipation of the people of Bangladesh.  The post- counter revolutionary government of General Zia and General Ershad acted to destroy these values amending the constitution as per their sweet will.

Sheikh Hasina has been fighting for last3 decades to restore them and since she is in control of governance much has been achieved already but the insertion, “Bismillah’’ since Islam as the state religion is still there challenging the secular character of the state. But Zia and Ershad, not for the sake of Islam but for politics commit a great mischief to the nation. These are so sensitive that to bring about change is really difficult. They did it not to show respect to Islam or to the Muslims but to exploit the religious sentiment of the people for political purpose.

The government of Sheikh Hasina has been treating all the religions equally like Bangabandhu. There are no discriminations but the fact is the constitution still holds it. The constitutional provision that religion should not be allowed to interfere the state affairs has not yet been guaranteed. About democracy, it has to be maintained properly other parties in Bangladesh do not practice democracy. The government in power cannot practice it alone despite the fact that Sheikh Hasina wants democracy in every sphere of our national life. Democracy cannot be restored by the ruling party alone.

During 23 years politics in East Pakistan, Bangabandhu did not face the kind of terrorism like religious extremism, ISIS Styled terrorist attack, political on the street, killing and burning people as Sheikh Hasina had to face during her tenure. The act of promoters of scientific socialism, Sarbahara Party of Siraj Sikder, Purbobanglar Sammyabadi Dal (M-L) of Comrade Toaha were certainly terrorism in nature. But the kind of terrorism that threatened the society during Sheikh Hasina’s regime was really different. The situation was so dangerous that Sheikh Hasina herself was attacked by the political opponent 19 times.

 All the time the attack was to annihilate Sheikh Hasina Physically. In case of Bangabandhu the fatal attack was a single one in which he had had been brutally killed. A gruesome attack was carried on Sheikh Hasina on 21 August 2004 in which she survived. Banga­bandhu did not face such attack from his political opponent as the nature of politics was not so violent then. Sheikh Hasina had to face the new kind of terrorists led by religious extremist. She has been relentlessly trying to stop it. 

She has been efficiently carrying on unprecedented pace of development that she conducted throug­hout the whole period of her governance leading the country to the highest position of glory. Dr S A Malek is former political adviser to the Prime Minister and Member of Parliament, general secretary of Bangabandhu 

Parishad and columnist